Title: The Cause of Cracking in Post-Tensioned Concrete Box Girder Bridges and Retrofit Procedures
Date: March-April, 1985
Volume: 30
Issue: 2
Page number: 82-139
Author(s): Walter Podolny, Jr.
https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03011985.82.139
Click here to access the full journal article
Abstract
The appearance of distress in the form of cracking in any concrete structure is one of concern and consternation to all parties involved. It is evidence of an unfavorable stress condition and if serious enough could affect the structure's integrity. Cracking may occur for a number of reasons but usually is the result of the interaction of several causative factors. These factors taken individually may be minor but when superimposed can result in distress. This paper presents documentation of problems that have led to cracking in post-tensioned concrete box girder bridges in Europe as well as in the United States. 1t discusses cracking resulting from inadequate flexural and shear capacity, thermal stress cracking, and cracking resulting from tendon curvature and tendon misalignment. Also discussed are possible retrofit measures. The intent of this paper is to bring these problems to the attention of the engineering and construction professions with the hope of precluding their recurrence.
References
1. Technical Instructions for the Inspection and Maintenance of Highway Structures, Interim Document 32, Sub-document 2, "Box Girder or Ribbed Panel Bridges, and Similar Prestressed Concrete Structures," Department of Highways and Highway Traffic, Ministry of Transportation (France), October 19, 1979.
2. Bouvy, J. J . , and Foxier, J., "Problems Encountered in Segmental Bridges Influencing Precast Segmental Construction," FIP Proceedings, V. 3, 1982.
3. Podolny, W., Jr., and Muller, J. M., Construction and Design of Prestressed Concrete Segmental Bridges, John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y., 1982.
4. Moreau, P., and Virlogeux, M., "Lessons From a Shear-Cracked Bridge," Eleventh Congress of the International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, Vienna, September 1-5, 1980.
5. Leonhardt, F., and Lippoth, W., "Lessons From Damage to Prestressed Concrete Bridges," Beton- und Stahlbetonbau (Berlin), No- 10, October 1970.
6. Leonhardt, F., Koch, R., and Rostasy, F. S., "Suspension Reinforcement for Indirect Loading of Prestressed Concrete Beams: Test Report and Recommendations," Beton- and Stahlbetonbau (Berlin), No. 10, October 1971.
7. National Association of Australian State Road Authorities, NAASRA Bridge Design Specifications, 5th Edition, 1976,
8. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, "Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges," 13th Edition, 1983.
9. Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Communication, "Ontario Highway Bridge Design Code and Commentary," 1979.
10. Priestley, M. J. N., and Buckle, 1. C., "Ambient Thermal Response of Concrete Bridges, Bulletin 42, Road Research Unit, National Roads Board, Wellington, New Zealand, 1979.
11. Priestley, M. J. N., "Design of Concrete Bridges for Temperature Gradients," ACI Journal, V. 75, No. 5, May 1978.
12. Leonhardt, F., "Prevention of Damages in Bridges," FIP Proceedings, V. 1, 1982,
13. Leonhardt, F., Kolbe, C., and Peter, J., "Temperature Differences Endanger Prestressed Concrete Bridges," Betonund Stahlbetonbau (Berlin), No. 7, July 1965.
14. New Zealand Ministry of Works and Development, "Highway Bridge Design Brief," CDP 701/D, Civil Division Publication, Wellington, New Zealand, September 1978. 15. British Standard BS 5400, Steel, Concrete and Composite Bridges, Part 1 General Statement, 1978.
16. Precast Segmental Box Girder Manual, Published jointly by the Prestressed Concrete Institute and Post-Tensioning Institute, 1978.
17. Hejnic, Jiri, "Effects of Temperature Changes on Prestressed Concrete Bridge," Presented at FIP Seventh Congress, New York, May 26-June 1, 1974.
18. "Proposed Recommendations for Segmental Construction in Prestressed Concrete," FIP Commission-Prefabrication, 3rd Draft, September 1977.
19. Stone, W. C., and Breen, J. E., "Analysis of Post-Tensioned Girder Anchorage Zones," Research Report 208-1, Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin, August 1980.
20. Stone, W. C., Paes-Filho, W., and Breen, J. E., "Behavior of Post-Tensioned Girder Anchorage Zones," Research Report 208-2, Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin, August 1980.
21. Stone, W. C., and Breen, J, E., "Design of Post-Tensioned Girder Anchorage Zones," Research Report 208-3F, Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin, June 1981.
22. Stone, W. C., and Breen, J. E-, "Behavior of Post-Tensioned Girder Anchorage Zones," PCI JOURNAL, V. 29, No. 1., January-February 1984, pp. 64-109.
23. Stone, W. C., and Breen, J. E., "Design of Post-Tensioned Girder Anchorage Zones," PCI JOURNAL, V. 29, No. 2, March-April 1984, pp. 28-61.
24. Gerwick, Ben C., Jr., "Causes and Prevention of Problems in Large-Scale Prestressed Construction," PCI JOURNAL, V. 27, No. 3, May-June 1982, pp. 58-75.
25. Harwood, Allan C., "I-205 Columbia River Bridge-Design and Construction Highlights," PCI JOURNAL, V. 27, No. 2, March-April 1982, pp. 56-77.
26, ACI Committee 318, "Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete (ACI 318-83)," American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Michigan, 1983.
27. Lecroq, P., and Poineau, D., "Reinforcement of Bridges by Prestressing," Eleventh Congress of the International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, Vienna, September 1-5,
1980.
28. Dilger, W. H., and Ghali, A., "Remedial Measures for Cracked Webs of Prestressed Concrete Bridges," PCI JOURNAL, V. 19, No. 4, July-August 1974, pp. 76-85.